Critique of Angels and Demons

     Angels and Demons is a very well written book. The deepness in each sentence is....astonishing. I am very impressed by Dan Browns ability to interpret this book to people who are not as big of readers (like myself) but still please an audience of deep thinkers. I am very intrigued by writing like this, but am a little skeptical if others are as well as I am. I mean let's be honest, the writing was very broad in range of emotion in the writing and the swings of the character's actions, emotions, and sometimes personalities. It could be very easy for a person to get lost in the emotion of the book, and I do not think that people who are big time "specialist" readers would enjoy the book as much as people who like this kind of writing.

     The characters were good, no doubt. I won't tamper too much with how the characters should have been because I did not create them. But the idea that Robert Langdon was an advanced degree graduate from Harvard in symbolism, he could act a bit too much...well, using more of his personality than his mind. He had a great personality, but it would kind of overcast on the fact that he was a super-genius professional symbologist, the best in the world to be precise. Vittoria Vettra was an astonishing character, written so well that I could picture every detail in my mind of how she was in her looks, speaking, and personality. The Hassassin was really weird, probably was supposed to be written that way though.

     Well, Angels and Demons is a great follow up to the Da Vinci Code (although it was supposed to be before the Da Vinci Code), and very well written, but like most every book, had some dull points to my taste. I give the book an 85% on my all time favorites. Pretty high considering I don't read too often, and I am more interested in movies and music to critique on. 

WELL DONE.